{
  "id": 2832710,
  "name": "Harley Meek, Plaintiff in Error, v. Chicago Railways Company, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Meek v. Chicago Railways Co.",
  "decision_date": "1913-11-21",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,321",
  "first_page": "272",
  "last_page": "273",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "183 Ill. App. 272"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 131,
    "char_count": 1310,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.518,
    "sha256": "a6180f94caa2226c2d976ba37a04ac2d999ccb639cf67f2197a5a7fe828af7e0",
    "simhash": "1:cf54e875584f13bd",
    "word_count": 223
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:57:27.806602+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Harley Meek, Plaintiff in Error, v. Chicago Railways Company, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Graves\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Graves"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Roy D. Keehn, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Frank L. Kriete and William H. Symmes, for defendant in error; John R. Guilliams, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Harley Meek, Plaintiff in Error, v. Chicago Railways Company, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 18,321.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Charles M. Walker, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1912.\nDismissed.\nOpinion filed November 21, 1913.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nAppeal and error, \u00a7 12 \u2014when writ of error is affected by appeal. Where orders as to the filing of a bill of exceptions sought to be reviewed by a writ of error were properly involved in and were considered and disposed of in the same case on appeal, the writ of error will be dismissed.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Harley Meelc, a.minor, by Mattie Gerbaum, Ms mother and next friend, against the Chicago Railways Company, a corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries. During the pendency of defendant\u2019s appeal from a judgment for ten thousand dollars (Gen. No. 18,034, ante, p. 256), plaintiff brings error to test correctness of orders as to filing a bill of exceptions.\nRoy D. Keehn, for plaintiff in error.\nFrank L. Kriete and William H. Symmes, for defendant in error; John R. Guilliams, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0272-01",
  "first_page_order": 294,
  "last_page_order": 295
}