{
  "id": 2833592,
  "name": "Elizabeth Ruff, Appellee, v. Henry Ericsson, Commissioner et al., Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ruff v. Ericsson",
  "decision_date": "1913-11-21",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,798",
  "first_page": "304",
  "last_page": "305",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "183 Ill. App. 304"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 1779,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.558,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.317852702137001e-08,
      "percentile": 0.43798538061485437
    },
    "sha256": "e987a5c2471b09c84aaf8821055b8b54983ddad0e22d69084c53eb4b368bcda7",
    "simhash": "1:9158892f1c0d9389",
    "word_count": 290
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:57:27.806602+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Elizabeth Ruff, Appellee, v. Henry Ericsson, Commissioner et al., Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baume\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baume"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William H. Sexton, for appellants; Loring R. Hoover, of counsel.",
      "Bernard J. Larkin and James M. Slattery, for appellee ; Henry D. Bottum, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Elizabeth Ruff, Appellee, v. Henry Ericsson, Commissioner et al., Appellants.\nGen. No. 19,798.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Charles A. McDonald, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1913.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed November 21, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill filed by Elizabeth Buff against Henry Ericsson, commissioner of buildings of the city of Chicago, and others praying that defendants be enjoined from interfering with complainant in proceeding with the removal of a building. From an order that writ issue, upon the filing of a bond in the sum of one thousand dollars, defendants appeal.\nWilliam H. Sexton, for appellants; Loring R. Hoover, of counsel.\nBernard J. Larkin and James M. Slattery, for appellee ; Henry D. Bottum, of counsel.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Injunction, \u00a7 219*\u2014when order granting injunction is conditional. An order granting an interlocutory injunction \u201cupon the filing of a bond therein in the sum of $1,000,\u201d is merely a conditional order whereof the condition remains unexecuted until the bond is filed.\n2. Injunction, \u00a7 385*\u2014when order will he reversed because informally entered. An order granting an interlocutory injunction \u201cupon the filing of a bond therein in the sum of $1,000\u201d which does not require the injunction to become operative within the time limited for taking an appeal therefrom is informally entered, and on appeal from such order when no bond has been filed and no writ of injunction has issued, the appeal may not properly be dismissed, but the order will be reversed because informally entered."
  },
  "file_name": "0304-01",
  "first_page_order": 326,
  "last_page_order": 327
}