{
  "id": 2837652,
  "name": "Prosper J. Soucy, Appellant, v. Francis Kirsch and Minnie Kirsch, Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "Soucy v. Kirsch",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "514",
  "last_page": "515",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "183 Ill. App. 514"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 110,
    "char_count": 1179,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.536,
    "sha256": "36dc7e44eb4bbf225923c9e8665ec3e6e5b010bbbac3b3f108af367202bb60f9",
    "simhash": "1:1bc36a8fcd838174",
    "word_count": 201
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:57:27.806602+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Prosper J. Soucy, Appellant, v. Francis Kirsch and Minnie Kirsch, Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McBride\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McBride"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Johnson-Johnson and W. L. Coley, for appellant.",
      "W. J. N. Moyers, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Prosper J. Soucy, Appellant, v. Francis Kirsch and Minnie Kirsch, Appellees.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the City Court of Bast St. Louis; the Hon. Robert H. Flannigan, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1913.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed October 9, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Prosper J. Soucy against Francis Kirsch and Minnie Kirsch to recover on a claim for rent of certain premises held by plaintiff as trustee. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nLandlord and tenant, \u00a7 301*\u2014what does not constitute a release from payment of rent. In an action for rent, a conversation between the defendant and the plaintiff, who subsequent to the letting became a trustee of the premises, held, not to amount to a release of payment of the rent and not valid as a compromise of defendant\u2019s claim for damages for want of repairs, where there was no agreement in the contract of letting requiring the owner to keep the premises in repair.\nJohnson-Johnson and W. L. Coley, for appellant.\nW. J. N. Moyers, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0514-01",
  "first_page_order": 536,
  "last_page_order": 537
}