{
  "id": 2834577,
  "name": "Sarah E. Long, Appellee, v. Hugh H. Long, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Long v. Long",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "566",
  "last_page": "566",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "183 Ill. App. 566"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 144,
    "char_count": 1612,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.532,
    "sha256": "5898732ffdaf33e64d612d4a49b4644ed64e56ff019e3743d43d5869bc0fb840",
    "simhash": "1:1133df84988ff338",
    "word_count": 267
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:57:27.806602+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Sarah E. Long, Appellee, v. Hugh H. Long, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Higbee\ndelivered the opinion of the court'.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Higbee"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Nelson B. Layman, for appellant.",
      "B. W. Pope, for appellee; R. J. McElvain, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Sarah E. Long, Appellee, v. Hugh H. Long, Appellant.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Husband and wife, \u00a7 219 \u2014when wife entitled to separate maintenance. In an action for separate maintenance where the bill alleges that the husband left his wife and went to a soldiers\u2019 home and failed to make provision so as to enable her to secure the necessaries of life, evidence held sufficient to show that she was entitled to separate maintenance.\n2. Husband and wife, \u00a7 243 \u2014when allowance in separate maintenance not unreasonable. In an action for separate maintenance where husband left the wife and lived at a soldiers\u2019 home, having property valued at five thousand dollars, an allowance of twenty-five dollars a month held reasonable.\n3. Appeal and error, \u00a7 998 \u2014when record must preserve documentary evidence denied admission. In a separate maintenance proceeding, the question whether the contents of a bill for divorce was admissible in evidence is not preserved for review when bill is not preserved in the record.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Perry county; the Hon. George A. Crow, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 9, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill by Sarah E. Long against Hugh H. Long for' separate maintenance. From a decree awarding complainant twenty-five dollars a month, defendant appeals.\nNelson B. Layman, for appellant.\nB. W. Pope, for appellee; R. J. McElvain, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0566-01",
  "first_page_order": 588,
  "last_page_order": 588
}