{
  "id": 2845710,
  "name": "Joseph Haber, Appellee, v. W. A. Jones Foundry & Machine Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Haber v. W. A. Jones Foundry & Machine Co.",
  "decision_date": "1913-12-22",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,350",
  "first_page": "70",
  "last_page": "70",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "184 Ill. App. 70"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 166,
    "char_count": 1693,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.498,
    "sha256": "1388b14abd40c54b35f01df8b8b34fa56741c4bd2cdb3e97fcdff689cbef6ed0",
    "simhash": "1:5181e82c588991dd",
    "word_count": 280
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:47:41.859813+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Joseph Haber, Appellee, v. W. A. Jones Foundry & Machine Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Winston, Payne, Strawn & Shaw, for appellant; Edward W. Everett, J. Sidney Condit and Rupert Donovan, of counsel.",
      "Gallagher & Messner, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Joseph Haber, Appellee, v. W. A. Jones Foundry & Machine Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 18,350.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Master and servant, \u00a7 688 \u2014when verdict for injuries to servant sustained by the evidence. In an action by a servant for injuries resulting from the defective condition of the coupling appliances of an iron pulley lathe, a verdict for plaintiff held not so clearly against the weight of the evidence that trial court erred in denying defendant\u2019s motion for a new trial.\n2. Master and servant, \u00a7 399 \u2014when servant assumes risk after promise to repair. Servant does not assume the risk because he was injured more than four hours after defendant promised to repair a defective machine. Whether plaintiff continued in employment longer than a reasonable time is a question of fact for the jury.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Fablin Q. Bale, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1912.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 22, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Joseph Haber against W. A. Jones Foundry & Machine Company to recover damages for the partial loss of plaintiff\u2019s thumb caused by being caught in an unprotected speed gear of an iron pulley lathe which plaintiff was operating for defendant at the time of the injury. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for one thousand dollars, defendant appeals.\nWinston, Payne, Strawn & Shaw, for appellant; Edward W. Everett, J. Sidney Condit and Rupert Donovan, of counsel.\nGallagher & Messner, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0070-01",
  "first_page_order": 94,
  "last_page_order": 94
}