{
  "id": 2844171,
  "name": "Annie Dunne, Appellee, v. Frank Bernardy, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dunne v. Bernardy",
  "decision_date": "1913-12-22",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,346",
  "first_page": "89",
  "last_page": "89",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "184 Ill. App. 89"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 150,
    "char_count": 1675,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.504,
    "sha256": "b04939e268b0ec329c629b40b401fe5ef52fba615dcd2600545e3f2ce91d2f71",
    "simhash": "1:d122e48438abc418",
    "word_count": 267
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:47:41.859813+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Annie Dunne, Appellee, v. Frank Bernardy, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McSurely.\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McSurely."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frank F. Aring, for appellant.",
      "John D. Casey and Elmer & Cohen, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Annie Dunne, Appellee, v. Frank Bernardy, Appellant.\nGen. No. 18,346.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Assault and battery, \u00a7 14 \u2014sufficiency of the evidence. In an action against defendant for spitting tobacco juice on the face and clothes of plaintiff, a verdict for plaintiff on conflicting evidence sustained.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1514 \u2014when inflammatory remarks of counsel not reversible error. Inflammatory remark of plaintiff\u2019s counsel in his speech to the jury though highly improper and would justify a reversal if it was not manifest that their intemperance worked a disadvantage to the plaintiff rather than to the defendant, held not reversible error, it appearing from the amount of ad, damnum in plaintiff\u2019s declaration, five thousand dollars, and the amount of the verdict, one hundred and fifty dollars, that the jury was not influenced to the prejudice of the defendant.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Samuel C. Stough, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1912.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 22, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Annie Dunne against Frank Bernardy to recover damages resulting from defendant spitting tobacco juice on plaintiff\u2019s face and clothes during an altercation between defendant and plaintiff\u2019s husband, in which plaintiff attempted to be peacemaker. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for one hundred and fifty dollars defendant appeals.\nFrank F. Aring, for appellant.\nJohn D. Casey and Elmer & Cohen, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0089-01",
  "first_page_order": 113,
  "last_page_order": 113
}