{
  "id": 2845749,
  "name": "C. E. Hoxworth, Appellant, v. Walter Kepple, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hoxworth v. Kepple",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "283",
  "last_page": "284",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "184 Ill. App. 283"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 146,
    "char_count": 1550,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.518,
    "sha256": "c52c49df3855ee80caec96090a17129746f4a78a2ecc1e1f1bef0ec78f502cc5",
    "simhash": "1:d673f98c74bc39e8",
    "word_count": 259
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:47:41.859813+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "C. E. Hoxworth, Appellant, v. Walter Kepple, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Philbrick\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Philbrick"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Vose & Creel, for appellant.",
      "Flack & Lawyer, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "C. E. Hoxworth, Appellant, v. Walter Kepple, Appellee.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the County Court of McDonough county; the Hon. Conbad G. Gumbart, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the April term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 16, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by C. E. Hoxworth against Walter Kepple to recover back money paid for hay on account of the hay being damaged and a mistake in measuring same and for breach of warranty for the quality thereof. Suit was commenced before a justice of the peace, where plaintiff recovered judgment.. Defendant then appealed to the County Court; where judgment was rendered in favor of defendant on a directed verdict, from which judgment plaintiff appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nAuctions and auctioneers, \u00a7 6 \u2014when purchaser of hay at auction sale cannot complain of amount paid for. Where a person purchases hay at an auction sale at so much a ton, it being announced at the time of the sale that the hay had been measured by disinterested persons and that bidders not satisfied with such measurements would be given opportunity to remeasure the same, held that the purchaser cannot complain that he did not get the full amount paid for where he voluntarily settles for the hay after he had ample opportunity to ascertain the amount thereof before making payment.\nVose & Creel, for appellant.\nFlack & Lawyer, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0283-01",
  "first_page_order": 307,
  "last_page_order": 308
}