{
  "id": 2841143,
  "name": "Ada Switzer, Appellee, v. A. A. Honn, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Switzer v. Honn",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "348",
  "last_page": "349",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "184 Ill. App. 348"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "254 Ill. 621",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        4687337
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/254/0621-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1703,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.529,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08499530281495175
    },
    "sha256": "f7994af36fa531353990d938aaa69a684b436c2ca7c9b87aa0c4d59e4755bb2e",
    "simhash": "1:07566a39008a948c",
    "word_count": 282
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:47:41.859813+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Ada Switzer, Appellee, v. A. A. Honn, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Thompson\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Partition, \u00a7 119 \u2014sufficiency of Mil to entitle complainant to solicitor\u2019s fees. Solicitor\u2019s fees will not be taxed against defendants in partition, where the original bill omitted necessary parties making it necessary for defendants to employ counsel to protect their interests. The bill should be so accurate that the parties defendant can safely allow a default to be taken against them.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Thompson"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "T. N. Cofer, for appellant.",
      "Henley & Douglas, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ada Switzer, Appellee, v. A. A. Honn, Appellant.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Partition, \u00a7 119 \u2014when hill insufficient to entitle complainant to solicitor\u2019s fees. In a partition proceeding where the original hill did not properly set forth the interest of the parties and omitted a necessary party, and it was only after answer was filed that the bill properly set forth the interest of all the owners, held that it was necessary for defendant to -employ counsel, and a decree awarding complainant solicitor\u2019s fees was reversed.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Coles county; the Hon. Mobton W. Thompson, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the April term, 1913.\nReversed in part.\nOpinion filed October 16, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill filed by Ada Switzer against A. A. Honn for partition of certain lands. From a decree awarding complainant one hundred and fifty dollars as solicitor\u2019s fees to be taxed as costs, defendant appeals.\nAn appeal from the decree granting the partition was taken to the Supreme Court where the decree was affirmed in Switzer v. Honn, 254 Ill. 621.\nT. N. Cofer, for appellant.\nHenley & Douglas, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0348-01",
  "first_page_order": 372,
  "last_page_order": 373
}