{
  "id": 2840337,
  "name": "Oliver J. Wright, Defendant in Error, v. John L. Bolen, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wright v. Bolen",
  "decision_date": "1914-01-22",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,519",
  "first_page": "569",
  "last_page": "570",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "184 Ill. App. 569"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 1726,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.524,
    "sha256": "943dc85fe9065d7c56f225ff1f8d5d39c09daecbc607ca33521f1dbb9a3ee1ad",
    "simhash": "1:5939cb25510e2a7c",
    "word_count": 284
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:47:41.859813+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Oliver J. Wright, Defendant in Error, v. John L. Bolen, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Master and servant, \u00a7 87 \u2014when defendant in suit for wages entitled to deduction of credits. In an action for wages a verdict in favor of plaintiff held too large in view of evidence showing that defendant was entitled to certain items as credits, and judgment was affirmed upon condition of remittitur.\n2. Witnesses, \u00a7 33 \u2014competency of plaintiff\u2019s wife to testify. In an action for wages where plaintiff testified that his wife on several occasions collected money for him from the defendant, held not error to permit plaintiff\u2019s wife to testify to a conversation with the defendant concerning plaintiff\u2019s account.\n3. Appear and error, \u00a7 523 \u2014method of making objections to oral instructions. Improper on making objections to oral instructions to divide the oral charge into separate numbered paragraphs.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Park Phipps, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Gideon S. Thompson, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Oliver J. Wright, Defendant in Error, v. John L. Bolen, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 18,519.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edwin K. Walker, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.\nAffirmed on remittitur; otherwise reversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed January 22, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Oliver J. Wright against John L. Bolen to recover for work and labor performed by the plaintiff as a carpenter and foreman for the defendant for certain periods of time stated in his statement of claim. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $858.70, defendant brings error.\nPark Phipps, for plaintiff in error.\nGideon S. Thompson, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0569-01",
  "first_page_order": 593,
  "last_page_order": 594
}