#### Louis A. Elisburg, Defendant in Error, v. Nellie K. Berkey and Arista W. Berkey, Plaintiffs in Error.

Gen. No. 19,122.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. David Sullivan, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 10, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action of forcible entry and detainer by Louis A. Elisburg against Nellie K. Berkey and Arista W. Berkey. A verdict and judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and the defendants prosecute error.

The record in this case is like that in Elisburg v. Berkey, ante, p. 389, except in this ease the flat was *391known as “No. 2” in the apartment building, while in that case the fiat was known as “No. 5.” The grounds urged for reversal are the same as in the case referred to and the decision in that case held controlling.

J. Marion Miller, for plaintiffs in error.

E. M. Seymour, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.