#### William F. Yost, Jr., Defendant in Error, v. William F. Yost, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 18,389.

(Not to Tbe reported in full.)

Abstract of the Decision.

Municipal Court of Chicago, § 29 * —when errors assigned are not disclosed hy the record. On writ of error to review a judg*411ment of the Municipal Court, where the stenographic report is stricken from the files of the Appellate Court and no assignment of error questions anything shown by the common law record but relates solely to matters that can appear only in a stenographic report. Held the judgment will be affirmed.

*410Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R Caverly, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 11, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by William F. Yost, Jr., against William F. Yost for money loaned. The jury found the issues against the defendant and assessed plaintiff’s damages at eight hundred and ninety-six dollars. To reverse a judgment entered on the verdict, defendant prosecutes a writ of error.

Julius C. Greenbaum, for plaintiff in error.

George J. Meier, for defendant in error.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice Graves

delivered the opinion of the court.