{
  "id": 2852990,
  "name": "The W. T. Rawleigh Medical Company, Appellee, v. J. W. Barnett, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Barnett",
  "decision_date": "1913-12-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "82",
  "last_page": "83",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 82"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 148,
    "char_count": 1610,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.55,
    "sha256": "51697948baeabea97ca4200c8546830f4f34511f71f1eb09fb71ef37070007fc",
    "simhash": "1:3241c275d8ae6a24",
    "word_count": 274
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The W. T. Rawleigh Medical Company, Appellee, v. J. W. Barnett, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Thompson\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Bills and notes, \u00a7 358 \u2014when plea of want of consideration demurrable. In an action on a promissory note, a special plea of want of consideration setting up that the note was given for a release of defendant by plaintiff from a void contract of guaranty, held inartificially drawn and subject to special demurrer.\n2. Appeal and ebboe, \u00a7 1361 \u2014\u2022when refusal to permit filing of additional pleas not error. Refusal of court to permit the filing of additional pleas, held not error, where application to file them was not made until the case was called for trial.\n3. Appeal and ebboe, \u00a7 986 \u2014when denial of motion for continuance not presented for review. The question whether the court erred in overruling a motion for a continuance is not preserved for review, where there is no motion for a continuance or showing thereon in the bill of exceptions.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Thompson"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "L. O. Williams, for appellant.",
      "Edward J. Sweeney and Morris J. Hinchcliff, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The W. T. Rawleigh Medical Company, Appellee, v. J. W. Barnett, Appellant.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of De Witt county; the Hon. Solon Philbkick, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 27, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction in assumpsit by The W. T. Rawleigh Medical Company, a corporation, against J. W. Barnett to recover upon a promissory note. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $538.13, defendant appeals.\nL. O. Williams, for appellant.\nEdward J. Sweeney and Morris J. Hinchcliff, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0082-01",
  "first_page_order": 108,
  "last_page_order": 109
}