{
  "id": 2851866,
  "name": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Thomas Osborn, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "City of Chicago v. Osborn",
  "decision_date": "1914-02-02",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,564",
  "first_page": "93",
  "last_page": "94",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 93"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 108,
    "char_count": 1147,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.497,
    "sha256": "83a4a6599691c06f1de1b2a14546a60a44e0320288d54fcd6e7d8765db9e1720",
    "simhash": "1:45c350bff51b92fb",
    "word_count": 191
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Thomas Osborn, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Henry M. Seligman, for plaintiff in error.",
      "William H. Sexton and James S. McInerney, for defendant in error; Albert J. W. Appell, Ulysses S. Schwartz and John Prystalski, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Thomas Osborn, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 18,564.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henbt C. Beitler, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1912.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed February 2, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nComplaint by City of Chicago against Thomas Osborn charging defendant with gambling in violation of Section 978 of the Municipal Code of Chicago. From a judgment finding defendant guilty, defendant appeals.\nHenry M. Seligman, for plaintiff in error.\nWilliam H. Sexton and James S. McInerney, for defendant in error; Albert J. W. Appell, Ulysses S. Schwartz and John Prystalski, of counsel.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nGaming, \u00a7 73*\u2014when evidence insufficient to show person guilty of bookmaking. On prosecution of a person for bookmaking in violation of the Municipal Code of Chicago, a verdict of guilty, held not sustained by the evidence, there being no evidence that any one made a bet with defendant or that a bet was made at the place named in the complaint."
  },
  "file_name": "0093-01",
  "first_page_order": 119,
  "last_page_order": 120
}