{
  "id": 2848205,
  "name": "Paul Block, Incorporated, Appellee, v. Frank O. Balch, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Paul Block, Inc. v. Balch",
  "decision_date": "1914-02-03",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,926",
  "first_page": "131",
  "last_page": "132",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 131"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 118,
    "char_count": 1162,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.553,
    "sha256": "5be953c3360ea4404581af80b2d0cd6b961adb7ffebd89504eedd372e988e0bc",
    "simhash": "1:285c400514229e6d",
    "word_count": 194
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Paul Block, Incorporated, Appellee, v. Frank O. Balch, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Harry A. Biossat, for appellant.",
      "Isaac S. Rothschild, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Paul Block, Incorporated, Appellee, v. Frank O. Balch, Appellant.\nGen. No. 18,926.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Robert H. Scott, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed February 3, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Paul Block, Incorporated, against Frank O. Balch on a promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.\nHarry A. Biossat, for appellant.\nIsaac S. Rothschild, for appellee.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nBills and notes, \u00a7 450*\u2014sufficiency of evidence of presentment for payment. Positive testimony by the holder of a note that same was presented to defendant as indorser on both the day before and on the day of its maturity, but that he did not request payment on the former date, was held, in the absence of a specific denial of the fact in controversy, to indicate- with sufficient certainty that the note was presented for payment on the date of its maturity, although in the course of his examination the witness became somewhat confused as to dates."
  },
  "file_name": "0131-01",
  "first_page_order": 157,
  "last_page_order": 158
}