{
  "id": 2848491,
  "name": "Mary Bottigliero, Defendant in Error, v. Samuel Polakow, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bottigliero v. Polakow",
  "decision_date": "1914-02-05",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,727",
  "first_page": "186",
  "last_page": "187",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 186"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 131,
    "char_count": 1581,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.515,
    "sha256": "31db3b582c04a0f02d29dae8d1838b17ae53a3f9a30d741d0c2f72790cc8c5c8",
    "simhash": "1:cd555d96502fd89d",
    "word_count": 261
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Mary Bottigliero, Defendant in Error, v. Samuel Polakow, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Scanlan\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nIndemnity, \u00a7. 25 \u2014amount recoverable. In an action by the purshaser of realty against the vendor to recover for the amount expended in redeeming from a sale of the premises on foreclosure of a mechanic\u2019s lien, the vendor having given an agreement to indemnify, defendant contended that attorney\u2019s fees paid by plaintiff in redeeming and the fee for filing the certificate of redemption were improperly included in the judgment because no written notice had been given to him of the filing of the mechanic\u2019s lien suit. Held, the finding of the trial court that such notice had been given was not manifestly against the weight of evidence.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Scanlan"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Max M. Grossman, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Thomas B. Lantry, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Mary Bottigliero, Defendant in Error, v. Samuel Polakow, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 18,727.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Jacob H. Hopkins, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed February 5, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Mary Bottigliero against Samuel Polakow in the Municipal Court of Chicago to recover sums expended in redeeming from a sale, on foreclosure of a mechanic\u2019s lien, of premises purchased by plaintiff from defendant, under an agreement on the part of the latter to indemnify against the lien. Prom a judgment for plaintiff for $377.88, defendant brings error.\nMax M. Grossman, for plaintiff in error.\nThomas B. Lantry, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest. Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0186-01",
  "first_page_order": 212,
  "last_page_order": 213
}
