{
  "id": 2850187,
  "name": "William J. Bigley, Defendant in Error, v. John J. Sweet, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bigley v. Sweet",
  "decision_date": "1914-02-17",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,735",
  "first_page": "202",
  "last_page": "203",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 202"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 147,
    "char_count": 1847,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.546,
    "sha256": "34be21f67051046fe2311ab055d0ef54e82dd9cd49dbb62aa18275b57435466c",
    "simhash": "1:b333e89155abb05c",
    "word_count": 327
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William J. Bigley, Defendant in Error, v. John J. Sweet, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court. >\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 839 \u2014filing bill of exceptions nunc pro tunc. Where the hill of exceptions was presented to and signed by the trial judge in time but was not filed until several months after, an order that the bill be filed nunc pro tunc as of the day of signing, for which no basis appears in the record, is void.\n2. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 952 \u2014when bill of exceptions may be stricken from record. Where the bill of exceptions was presented to and signed by the trial judge in time but through the negligence of the attorney was not filed until several months later, when the time for filing had expired, same will be stricken from the record, although ordered filed nunc pro tunc as of the date of signing, no basis for the order appearing in the record.\n3. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 956 \u2014effect of striking bill of exceptions from record. None of the assignments of error can be considered where based exclusively upon the bill of exceptions and stenographic report which was ordered stricken from the record.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. K. McMahon, for plaintiff in error.",
      "W. J. King, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William J. Bigley, Defendant in Error, v. John J. Sweet, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 19,735.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nErorr to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Feed. C. Hill, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed February 17, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nMotion to strike from the transcript of record the stenographic report or bill of exceptions and to affirm the judgment, on error to the Municipal Court of Chicago, bringing up a judgment for plaintiff in an action by William J. Bigley against John J. Sweet.\nJ. K. McMahon, for plaintiff in error.\nW. J. King, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Yols. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0202-01",
  "first_page_order": 228,
  "last_page_order": 229
}