{
  "id": 2854197,
  "name": "Sam Barnett and George Barnett, copartners as Barnett Brothers, Appellants, v. Joseph Friedman et al., Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "Barnett v. Friedman",
  "decision_date": "1914-03-05",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,866",
  "first_page": "218",
  "last_page": "219",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 218"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 159,
    "char_count": 2094,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.512,
    "sha256": "2c49e939b552c447f8d94535b03fa02bf41d51d575a5c0e45f975a362f61ac05",
    "simhash": "1:4f7987b7440bd056",
    "word_count": 355
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Sam Barnett and George Barnett, copartners as Barnett Brothers, Appellants, v. Joseph Friedman et al., Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "D. B. Brillow, for appellants.",
      "F. P. Salisbury and M. Marso, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Sam Barnett and George Barnett, copartners as Barnett Brothers, Appellants, v. Joseph Friedman et al., Appellees.\nGen. No. 18,866.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Adelor J. Petit, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 5, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill filed by Sam Barnett and George Barnett, co-partners, doing business in the name of Barnett Brothers, against Joseph Friedman, D. J. Friedman and John P. Tansey to cancel a contract for the purchase of diamonds and jewelry and to enjoin a suit on. a note given for part of the purchase price. The bill alleged that the complainants purchased the articles from the Friedmans, who guarantied the weight of the diamonds as stated on tags attached thereto, and that they had fraudulently transferred a note given by Sam Barnett for part of the purchase price to defendant Tansey, who took with knowledge of the warranty. From a decree dismissing the bill and granting the relief prayed in Tansey\u2019s cross-bill, complainants appeal.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nInjunction, \u00a7 206' '\u2014when decree dismissing Mil to enjoin suit on note sustained hy the evidence. On hill to cancel a contract for the purchase of diamonds and jewelry for breach of warranty and to enjoin a suit on a note given for part of the purchase price, it being alleged that the note was transferred by the payees to the party suing on the note who took with knowledge of the conditions of warranty, held that a decree dismissing the original bill and awarding the relief prayed in the cross-bill filed by the holder of the note was sustained by the evidence, it appearing that the note was transferred to holder before maturity and for valuable consideration without notice of the conditions under which the note was given to the payees.\nD. B. Brillow, for appellants.\nF. P. Salisbury and M. Marso, for appellees.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0218-01",
  "first_page_order": 244,
  "last_page_order": 245
}