{
  "id": 2850341,
  "name": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Ruth Long, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "City of Chicago v. Long",
  "decision_date": "1914-03-09",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,743",
  "first_page": "268",
  "last_page": "268",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 268"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 133,
    "char_count": 1443,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.519,
    "sha256": "162744e00b41edd7fedc3b8d4b4fc72cd43c5cc257cd9f2fe9d30973ac3def84",
    "simhash": "1:cb5bec0dd1eaa0b4",
    "word_count": 246
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Ruth Long, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "D. B. Brillow, for plaintiff in error.",
      "William H. Sexton and James S. McInerney, for defendant in error; Albert J. W. Appell and Ulysses S. Schwartz, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Ruth Long, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 18,743.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nMunicipal corporations, \u00a7 867 \u2014what constitutes waiver of joint trial for violation of ordinance. In a prosecution against defendant for violation of an ordinance against the keeping of houses of ill fame or assignation, the fact that defendant\u2019s ease was tried with cases against three women charged with being inmates and two men charged with being patrons of the house is not available to defendant where the jury was sworn separately in each case to try the issues and no objection was made to the jury being sworn to try the issues in the other cases.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry C. Beitler, Judge, Presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1912.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 9, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nProsecution by the City of Chicago against Ruth Long based upon the violation by defendant of an ordinance of the City of Chicago prohibiting the keeping of houses of ill fame or assignation. From a judgment of conviction, defendant brings error.\nD. B. Brillow, for plaintiff in error.\nWilliam H. Sexton and James S. McInerney, for defendant in error; Albert J. W. Appell and Ulysses S. Schwartz, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0268-01",
  "first_page_order": 294,
  "last_page_order": 294
}