{
  "id": 2853311,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. R. B. Smith, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Smith",
  "decision_date": "1914-03-09",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,503",
  "first_page": "286",
  "last_page": "286",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 286"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 135,
    "char_count": 1511,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.517,
    "sha256": "04bf68104a1e0b2ca4ef5d3da12f364f1171ca17dd72709294745ba2089b2a7c",
    "simhash": "1:556e4a29f14d32bc",
    "word_count": 241
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. R. B. Smith, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Pbesiding Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Pbesiding Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "G-eeting, Potts & Van Dellen, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Maclay Hoyne, for defendant in error; Zach Hofheimeb, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. R. B. Smith, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 19,503.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Disobdebly house, \u00a7 2 \u2014what evidence inadmissible in prosecution for keeping. In a prosecution for maintaining a disorderly house, testimony of witnesses that they had not seen evidence that defendant\u2019s house was being run for immoral purposes, or that fornication or drinking was carried on there, is incompetent and properly excluded.\n2. Cbiminal law, \u00a7 122 \u2014when evidence of reputation inadmissible. In a prosecution for keeping a disorderly house, evidence in behalf of defendant showing his good reputation for truth and veracity is inadmissible where not attacked by the prosecution.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Rueus F. Robinson, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 9, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nProsecution by The People of the State of Illinois against B. B. Smith on information in the Municipal Court of Chicago charging him with keeping a common, ill-governed disorderly house, kept for the encouragement of drinking and fornication. From a judgment of conviction, defendant brings error.\nG-eeting, Potts & Van Dellen, for plaintiff in error.\nMaclay Hoyne, for defendant in error; Zach Hofheimeb, of counsel.\nSeo Illinois Notes Digest, Vote, XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0286-01",
  "first_page_order": 312,
  "last_page_order": 312
}