{
  "id": 2850401,
  "name": "John Hemwall Automobile Company, Defendant in Error, v. George Cassidy, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "John Hemwall Automobile Co. v. Cassidy",
  "decision_date": "1914-03-09",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,655",
  "first_page": "310",
  "last_page": "311",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 310"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 133,
    "char_count": 1447,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.517,
    "sha256": "ea572d0f85f8f0577adc52563586cfc22a96a7591a7073a8dcd8480477c101ed",
    "simhash": "1:0fd9ca11d08ca099",
    "word_count": 244
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John Hemwall Automobile Company, Defendant in Error, v. George Cassidy, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Brown\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Brown"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles A. Ward, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Percival Steele, for defendant in error; H. L. Cavendbr, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John Hemwall Automobile Company, Defendant in Error, v. George Cassidy, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 18,655.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph Z. Uhlir, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1912.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 9, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by John Hemwall Automobile Company against George Cassidy to recover damages for breach of contract for the purchase of an automobile. Plaintiff recovered a judgment in the Municipal Court of Chicago for one hundred dollars, to reverse which defendant sued out a writ of error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nAutomobiles, \u00a7 4 \u2014when purchaser liable for breach of contract. In an action for breach of contract for the purchase of an automobile, plaintiff claimed that the sale was by sample and that a car similar to the sample had been furnished, while defendant contended that he bought a particular car picked out from plaintiff\u2019s stock and did not get it. Defendant used the machine a few days and then returned it and plaintiff resold it at an alleged loss of two hundred dollars. Held that a verdict for plaintiff for one hundred dollars was sustained by the evidence.\nCharles A. Ward, for plaintiff in error.\nPercival Steele, for defendant in error; H. L. Cavendbr, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0310-01",
  "first_page_order": 336,
  "last_page_order": 337
}