{
  "id": 2847302,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Patrick O'Malley, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. O'Malley",
  "decision_date": "1914-03-09",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,446",
  "first_page": "315",
  "last_page": "315",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 315"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 148,
    "char_count": 1757,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.515,
    "sha256": "2087c93da33db47278502789a49085722167a2a6fb58e59dd7bee5731041b134",
    "simhash": "1:c37b6fdef14da3b9",
    "word_count": 295
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Patrick O\u2019Malley, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Brown\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Brown"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "'Thomas J. 0 \u2019Hare, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Maclay Hoyne, for defendant in error; Francis E. Hinckley, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Patrick O\u2019Malley, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 19,446.\n(Not to The reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nIntoxicating liquors, \u00a7 148 \u2014when conviction for keeping saloon open on election day not sustained by the evidence. On information charging a saloon keeper with keeping his saloon open on a special election day in violation of the statutes of Illinois, the evidence held insufficient to show that the place was \u201copen\u201d in the sense manifestly used by the statute and insufficient to sustain a conviction, the witnesses for the People being three police officers who testified that they entered the saloon at a side entrance and found the defendant and four other men inside but there was no evidence that drinks were served and there being evidence that the doors were locked and also evidence explaining the presence 'of the persons found in the saloon.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hugh R. Stewart, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1913.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed March 9, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nInformation filed by The People of the State of Illinois charging Patrick O\u2019Malley with keeping his saloon open on a special election day within one mile of the place of holding the election, in violation of the statutes of Illinois. Defendant waived a jury trial, and the court found him guilty and fined him twenty-five dollars. To reverse the judgment, defendant prosecutes a writ of error.\n'Thomas J. 0 \u2019Hare, for plaintiff in error.\nMaclay Hoyne, for defendant in error; Francis E. Hinckley, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vol\u00e9. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0315-01",
  "first_page_order": 341,
  "last_page_order": 341
}