{
  "id": 2853814,
  "name": "Thomas Smith, Defendant in Error, v. Martin Fligel, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. Fligel",
  "decision_date": "1914-03-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,174",
  "first_page": "359",
  "last_page": "360",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 359"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 107,
    "char_count": 1128,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.522,
    "sha256": "78837ec788898d8a5687d4c478add2185b782d2443364d3ca9f7f7b43699f20a",
    "simhash": "1:413068a5408f92fd",
    "word_count": 188
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Thomas Smith, Defendant in Error, v. Martin Fligel, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Blum & Blum, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Harry Brown, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Thomas Smith, Defendant in Error, v. Martin Fligel, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 19,174.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph P. Rattebty, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed March 10, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Thomas Smith against Martin Fligel to recover the value of lumber wrongfully converted. From a judgment for plaintiff for fifty dollars, defendant brings error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nBailment, \u00a7 10 \u2014when gratuitous bailee not liable. In an action for the conversion of lumber placed by plaintiff on the property of defendant, with the latter\u2019s consent, there being no evidence to show that any of the lumber was taken by defendant, it was held that defendant was merely a gratuitous bailee, and, in the absence of evidence of gross negligence on his part, was not liable.\nBlum & Blum, for plaintiff in error.\nHarry Brown, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section numbed"
  },
  "file_name": "0359-01",
  "first_page_order": 385,
  "last_page_order": 386
}