{
  "id": 2848005,
  "name": "Louis A. Elisburg, Defendant in Error, v. Nellie K. Berkey and Arista W. Berkey, Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Elisburg v. Berkey",
  "decision_date": "1914-03-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,122",
  "first_page": "390",
  "last_page": "391",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 390"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 100,
    "char_count": 1012,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.48,
    "sha256": "9e69e75ada2c9a1a9181baa9c1f76f0ca88243dc05cf245a52cefd38f69b98e0",
    "simhash": "1:c53040c7063cb5c8",
    "word_count": 179
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Louis A. Elisburg, Defendant in Error, v. Nellie K. Berkey and Arista W. Berkey, Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Clark\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Clark"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. Marion Miller, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "E. M. Seymour, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Louis A. Elisburg, Defendant in Error, v. Nellie K. Berkey and Arista W. Berkey, Plaintiffs in Error.\nGen. No. 19,122.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. David Sullivan, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 10, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction of forcible entry and detainer by Louis A. Elisburg against Nellie K. Berkey and Arista W. Berkey. A verdict and judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and the defendants prosecute error.\nThe record in this case is like that in Elisburg v. Berkey, ante, p. 389, except in this ease the flat was known as \u201cNo. 2\u201d in the apartment building, while in that case the fiat was known as \u201cNo. 5.\u201d The grounds urged for reversal are the same as in the case referred to and the decision in that case held controlling.\nJ. Marion Miller, for plaintiffs in error.\nE. M. Seymour, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0390-01",
  "first_page_order": 416,
  "last_page_order": 417
}