{
  "id": 2851762,
  "name": "Causetta Posey, Defendant in Error, v. William B. Graham, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Posey v. Graham",
  "decision_date": "1914-03-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,081",
  "first_page": "392",
  "last_page": "393",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 392"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 113,
    "char_count": 1300,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.524,
    "sha256": "cc55a0d1b62dd591616031a6d64b1f2143cce6e401a42931dd7ee9ce8a0a8017",
    "simhash": "1:95444005359e92a4",
    "word_count": 220
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Causetta Posey, Defendant in Error, v. William B. Graham, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Cdark\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Cdark"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Rogers & Mahoney, for plaintiff in error; Howard M. Harped, of counsel. \\",
      "John Frederick Haas, for defendant in error; Henry Lynch, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Causetta Posey, Defendant in Error, v. William B. Graham, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 19,081.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. David T. Smiley, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 10, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Causetta Posey against William B. Graham on a contract giving plaintiff an option of an interest in certain lands, or a return of the amount advanced with interest. She elected to take a return of the advancement and claimed that defendant refused to pay the money, offering instead shares of stock in a certain company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nContracts, \u00a7 384*\u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain recovery in action on contract. In an action upon a contract giving plaintiff an option of an interest in certain lands, or a return of the amount advanced with interest, she having elected to take a return of the advancement, a verdict in her favor was held not to he against the weight of evidence.\nRogers & Mahoney, for plaintiff in error; Howard M. Harped, of counsel. \\\nJohn Frederick Haas, for defendant in error; Henry Lynch, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0392-01",
  "first_page_order": 418,
  "last_page_order": 419
}