{
  "id": 2850154,
  "name": "John H. McNally, Plaintiff in Error, v. Lulu Regan et al., Defendants in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "McNally v. Regan",
  "decision_date": "1914-03-11",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,516",
  "first_page": "424",
  "last_page": "425",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 424"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 170,
    "char_count": 1774,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.504,
    "sha256": "10b6e1c0ff4bb8bff0b86388256e370a8f0622af98940139ef55fbc2b71e9d40",
    "simhash": "1:4966201dfc09127c",
    "word_count": 292
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John H. McNally, Plaintiff in Error, v. Lulu Regan et al., Defendants in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baume\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baume"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William H. Sextok and Michael F. Sullivae, for plaintiff in error; Charles J. Traihor, of counsel.",
      "Johh Stele, for defendants in error Christopher Strassheim and Michael Zimmer."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John H. McNally, Plaintiff in Error, v. Lulu Regan et al., Defendants in Error.\nGen. No. 18,516.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed March 11, 1914.\nStatement of the Cas\u00e9.\nBill by John H. McNally against Lulu Began, Christopher Strassheim, former sheriff of Cook county and Michael Zimmer, present sheriff of said county, praying for relief against a judgment at law against complainant, and that the two defendants last named be restrained from executing a writ of capias ad satis faciendum, issued on said judgment. From a decree dismissing his bill, complainant brings error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nJudgment, \u00a7 328 \u2014when perjured testimony ground for new trial in equity. Where in an action for trespass against a police officer in making an arrest, plaintiff alleged and testified that she was seriously injured and that prior to such arrest she had never been injured and had been in perfect health, on the strength of which she recovered a judgment for one thousand five hundred, a bill in equity for a new trial will be sustained on proof that plaintiff\u2019s testimony was perjured,- and that several years previously, in an action against another, she had testified to identical injuries as the result of a street car accident, due diligence on complainant\u2019s part being shown.\nWilliam H. Sextok and Michael F. Sullivae, for plaintiff in error; Charles J. Traihor, of counsel.\nJohh Stele, for defendants in error Christopher Strassheim and Michael Zimmer.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Yds. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0424-01",
  "first_page_order": 450,
  "last_page_order": 451
}