{
  "id": 2847568,
  "name": "J. W. Netterstrom, Defendant in Error, v. Kinzie Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Netterstrom v. Kinzie Manufacturing Co.",
  "decision_date": "1914-03-11",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,509",
  "first_page": "450",
  "last_page": "451",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 450"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1485,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.538,
    "sha256": "6b5288d897b3d8b50c4db39d37928f04e79eb75573ba37067a8e4eacfcaa0b59",
    "simhash": "1:59f7c08d919cd17d",
    "word_count": 238
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. W. Netterstrom, Defendant in Error, v. Kinzie Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Duncan\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Appeal and ebbob# \u00a7 1410 \u2014when judgment not reversed as against evidence. A judgment will not be reversed as unsupported by evidence unless clearly and' manifestly against the weight of the evidence.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Duncan"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Brady & Levy, for plaintiff in error; Josiah Burn-ham:, of counsel. \u25a0",
      "Charles F. McKinley, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. W. Netterstrom, Defendant in Error, v. Kinzie Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 18,509.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Architects and engineers, \u00a7 3 \u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain claim for commissions. In an action by an architect for commissions, the evidence was held to sustain his claim that a contract was procured through an estimate and bid made by him, and that under an agreement with defendant he was entitled to commissions thereon.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Perry L. Persons, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 11, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by J. W. Netterstrom against Kinzie Manufacturing Company to recover commissions on contracts secured for defendant through estimates and bids made by plaintiff. From a judgment for three hundred and twenty-five dollars, defendant brings error.\nBrady & Levy, for plaintiff in error; Josiah Burn-ham:, of counsel. \u25a0\nCharles F. McKinley, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vole. XI to XV, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0450-01",
  "first_page_order": 476,
  "last_page_order": 477
}