{
  "id": 2848348,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Charlie Lee, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Lee",
  "decision_date": "1914-03-11",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,684",
  "first_page": "452",
  "last_page": "454",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 452"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 249,
    "char_count": 3477,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.538,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.380125665320789e-08,
      "percentile": 0.39376349740853617
    },
    "sha256": "856a781edd3041afa398e9e192b8eed9230cb58bdad3a14f2be013aa7b63da46",
    "simhash": "1:5e65c01d900f64e9",
    "word_count": 589
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Charlie Lee, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Duncan\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n4. Indictment and information, \u00a7 20 \u2014verification of amended information. Where an information is amended in court, it must be reverified by the prosecuting witness, and a new affidavit and jurat in due form should be appended and subscribed by the prosecuting witness and the officer in the same manner as originally.\n5. Criminal law, \u00a7 497 \u2014presumption as to amendment of information. It cannot be presumed that an information was amended from a showing that leave to amend was granted.\n6. Criminal law, \u00a7 372 \u2014what constitutes judgment. The announcement of the court or the judge\u2019s minutes are no part of the judgment proper, and cannot be so considered; they merely serve as indicators for the correct recording of the judgment and sentence in the record by the clerk.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Duncan"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Friedman & Ader, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Maclay Hoyne, for defendant in error; Edward E. Wilson, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Charlie Lee, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 19,684.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph Z. Uhlir, .Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 11, 1914.\nRehearing denied March 24, 1914.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Infants, \u00a7 5a \u2014when information charging defendant with contributing to delinquency of female child sufficient. An information charging in substance that the defendant unlawfully encouraged the delinquency of a female child and did acts contributing to conditions which rendered her a delinquent child, and that the defendant took such female child and lived with her as man and wife contrary to the form of the statute, etc., held sufficient after verdict in the absence of a motion to quash it as against objections that it omitted the words \u201cas defined by the statutes of this State\u201d and \u201cas so defined\u201d, and that it did not state in what particulr the female was or had been 'delinquent.\n2. Indictment and information, \u00a7 11 \u2014when information not vitiated by indorsement on margin. An information charging the commission of an offense on July 10, 1913, is not vitiated by a statement on the margin thereof signed by the clerk \u201cWilliam F. Bowler resworn July 15, 1913,\u201d where there is no indication on the face of the information that it was amended by erasing any former date, and the record does not recite that it was amended in that manner or otherwise.\n3. Indictment and information, \u00a7 18 \u2014verification of inform,ation. When an information is presented by a party other than the State\u2019s Attorney, it must, under the Municipal Court Act, be sworn to by him, and his affidavit in due form should be appended thereto and subscribed by him, and the jurat of the officer in due form should also be appended and signed by him in his official capacity.\nStatement of the Case.\nInformation by The People of the State of Illinois charging Charlie Lee with unlawful acts contributing to the delinquency of Nellie Furlong, a female child under the age of eighteen years. Defendant was found guilty by the Municipal Court \u201cin manner and form as charged in the information\u201d and sentenced to confinement at labor in the House of Correction for six months. To reverse the judgment, defendant prosecutes error.\nFriedman & Ader, for plaintiff in error.\nMaclay Hoyne, for defendant in error; Edward E. Wilson, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vois. XI to XV, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0452-01",
  "first_page_order": 478,
  "last_page_order": 480
}