{
  "id": 2847267,
  "name": "In re Estate of Lazarus Silverman, deceased. On Appeal of Freda J. Wolf, Administratrix, Appellant, v. Estate of Lazarus Silverman, Deceased, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wolf v. Estate of Lazarus Silverman",
  "decision_date": "1914-03-30",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,942",
  "first_page": "570",
  "last_page": "572",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 570"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "78 Ill. 152",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        824041
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/78/0152-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "128 Ill. 304",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5412160
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/128/0304-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 280,
    "char_count": 4432,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.515,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08504376123858959
    },
    "sha256": "2c4998b00dabc75b8b686a56d200aa4a14ed960a683ad819c4e3e5743da6c25f",
    "simhash": "1:536e3c646a2ae4d7",
    "word_count": 772
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In re Estate of Lazarus Silverman, deceased. On Appeal of Freda J. Wolf, Administratrix, Appellant, v. Estate of Lazarus Silverman, Deceased, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThe judgment in this case must be reversed and the cause remanded, for the reason that in our opinion the trial court was in error in his view of the law applicable to the facts. Ernestine Wolf held a note made by Lazarus Silverman dated February 27, 1894. Judgmen on this note was had on April 14,1896. On April 23, 1900, Silverman was discharged in bankruptcy. It is said that subsequently he promised to pay Ernestine Wolf the amount of this judgment. Silverman having died, Ernestine Wolf presented her claim in the Probate Court against the estate of Lazarus Silverman, and it was allowed. Appeal was had to the Circuit Court, and Ernestine Wolf having died, Freda Wolf, her administratrix, was substituted. After trial without a jury in the Circuit Court the claim was dismissed.\nThe trial court was in error in holding as a matter of law that the judgment of April 14, 1896, became \u201coutlawed on the 14th day of April, 1903, unless revived by scire facias or by an action in debt thereon in a court of competent jurisdiction,\u201d and in holding that the Probate Court could not allow the claim unless the judgment had been revived by scire facias or an action in debt, as provided for by section 6, chapter 77 of the Revised Statutes (J. & A. ff 6752). We are of the opinion that this section has no application here. It provides that no execution shall issue upon any judgment after the expiration of seven years from the time the same becomes a lien, except upon the revival of the same by scire facias. There is here no question touching the issuing of an execution; hence this section is not in point. Section 26, ch. 83, entitled \u201cLimitations\u201d (J. & A. 7221), is the statute which provides in effect that the life of a judgment shall be twenty years, and this section is controlling upon the point before us. Hence the judgment in question would not become \u201coutlawed\u201d until April 14, 1916, and was a proper subject for adjudication in the Probate Court, unaffected by any question of revivor by scire facias or otherwise. Winslow v. Leland, 128 Ill. 304 (339); Clingman v. Hopkie, 78 Ill. 152.\nIt was also error to hold that the claim was \u201cbarred by the limitation provided for in Section 19, Chapter 83, Revised Statute of Illinois [J. & A. ff 7214] for failure on her part to revive the judgment sued upon in this case by scire facias or by an action in debt within one year after the issuance of letters testamentary of administration.\u201d Section 19 provides in effect for extending the time for bringing suit, where the debtor dies within the time limited, to a time after the expiration of the limitation but within one year after the issuing of letters. This has no bearing upon the situation under consideration if, as we hold under the statute, the life of the judgment runs for twenty years after its date.\nThe judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Henry Both, for appellant.",
      "Elijah N. Zoline and Morris K. Levinson, for appellee ; Edward F. Dunne, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In re Estate of Lazarus Silverman, deceased. On Appeal of Freda J. Wolf, Administratrix, Appellant, v. Estate of Lazarus Silverman, Deceased, Appellee.\nGen. No. 18,942.\n1. Executors and administrators, \u00a7 217 \u2014when judgment may he alloiued as claim against estate without revival after seven years from (late thereof. A judgment may be allowed as a claim against the estate of the judgment debtor within twenty years from the date of its rendition without being revived by scire facias after the expiration of seven years, as provided by section 6, ch. 77, R S., J. & A. If 6756.\n2. Executors and administrators, \u00a7 217 \u2014necessity of revival of judgment within year after issuance of letters to have judgment allowed as claim against estate. Section 19, ch. 83 R S., J. & A. If 7214, does not require a judgment to be revived by scire facias or by an action of debt within one year after the issuance of letters testamentary or administration, in order to have the judgment allowed as a claim against the estate of the judgment debtor within twenty years from its date.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. H. Sterling Pomeroy, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1912.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed March 30, 1914.\nRehearing denied April 13, 1914.\nHenry Both, for appellant.\nElijah N. Zoline and Morris K. Levinson, for appellee ; Edward F. Dunne, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0570-01",
  "first_page_order": 596,
  "last_page_order": 598
}