{
  "id": 2850852,
  "name": "Bertha Rohn, Appellee, v. Robert F. Rohn, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rohn v. Rohn",
  "decision_date": "1914-03-31",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,335",
  "first_page": "594",
  "last_page": "595",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 594"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 160,
    "char_count": 1960,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.559,
    "sha256": "3d75d4f2f3e47732f614b79ef7c417d76a31ab38ca1761a04d799e6d94c648b4",
    "simhash": "1:8f909caacccd2a7d",
    "word_count": 316
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Bertha Rohn, Appellee, v. Robert F. Rohn, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Albert Wesley Gottschalk, for appellant.",
      "Frank S. Bigheimer, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Bertha Rohn, Appellee, v. Robert F. Rohn, Appellant.\nGen. No. 19,335.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Divorce, \u00a7 141 \u2014when allowance of temporary alimony and solicitor\u2019s fees authorized by defendant\u2019s answer. Allowance of five dollars per week for temporary alimony and twenty-five dollars for solicitor\u2019s fees, held authorized by defendant\u2019s answer, without any testimony, where his answer showed he owned a lot worth two hundred dollars and received five hundred dollars a year to attend to his mother\u2019s investments, it not appearing that it took all his time or that he had any one but his wife to support.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 726 \u2014when order for temporary alimony and solicitor\u2019s fees sustained by answer in absence of preservation of testimony. Allowance of five dollars per week for temporary alimony and twenty-five dollars for solicitor\u2019s fees, held authorized by defendant\u2019s answer, though the testimony was not preserved in the record.\n3. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1170 \u2014moot questions. On appeal from an order allowing temporary alimony and solicitor\u2019s fees, where it appears from the record that a final decree has been entered reserving to the court for future consideration the question of alimony and solicitor\u2019s fees, held that the question presented was largely a moot question.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Edward M. Mangan, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 31, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill by Bertha Bohn against Bohert Bolin for divorce on the ground of impotency of defendant. From an order for temporary alimony and solicitor\u2019s fees based on the pleadings and testimony of defendant, defendant appeals.\nAlbert Wesley Gottschalk, for appellant.\nFrank S. Bigheimer, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vois. XI to XV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0594-01",
  "first_page_order": 620,
  "last_page_order": 621
}