{
  "id": 2852484,
  "name": "Emma J. Herzog, Appellee, v. German National Life Insurance Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Herzog v. German National Life Insurance",
  "decision_date": "1914-03-31",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,344",
  "first_page": "614",
  "last_page": "615",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. App. 614"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 117,
    "char_count": 1415,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.521,
    "sha256": "ddea96a4f157d47b162a67108c85cb81cbbb2628e2ffad6120f407575f411e99",
    "simhash": "1:c951144344268e33",
    "word_count": 236
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:38.716309+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Emma J. Herzog, Appellee, v. German National Life Insurance Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Clark\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Clark"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Samuel Shaw Parks, for appellant.",
      "George A. MgCorkle, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Emma J. Herzog, Appellee, v. German National Life Insurance Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 19,344.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 31, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Emma J. Herzog against German National Life Insurance Company to recover on a policy of reinsurance issued upon the life of John A. Herzog, plaintiff, the wife of the insured, being named beneficiary therein. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nInsurance, \u00a7 706*\u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain recovery on policy of reinsurance. In an action by a beneficiary on a life insurance policy where the facts showed that a policy had been issued by another company and that the defendant Company had taken over the business of the former company and reinsured its policy holders, and had issued the policy sued on, held that there was sufficient evidence to show that the policy upon which the judgment was based was in force as a reinsurance of the insured by the defendant in pursuance of its contract with the former company, and that a judgment in favor of plaintiff was sustained by the evidence.\nSamuel Shaw Parks, for appellant.\nGeorge A. MgCorkle, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0614-01",
  "first_page_order": 640,
  "last_page_order": 641
}