#### Frank A. Krasa, Defendant in Error, v. Nett W. Robbins, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 19,205.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry P. Dolan, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 4, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Frank A. Krasa against Nett W. Bobbins to recover commissions claimed to be earned by plaintiff in procuring a purchaser of defendant’s property. Upon a trial a jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. To reverse a judgment entered on the verdict, defendant brings error.

Gustav E. Beerly, for plaintiff in error; Lewis Binakee, of counsel.

George H. Mason, for defendant in error.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarter!', same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court,

*199Abstract of the Decision.

1. Brokers, § 48 * —when entitled to commissions for procuring purchaser of real estate. In an action for commissions for procuring a purchaser for defendant’s real estate, a verdict for plaintiff held sustained by the evidence, it appearing that plaintiff procured a purchaser at the price he was authorized to sell and that defendant refused to sell at that price or at an increased price and then told plaintiff the property was not for sale, but subsequently sold the property to the purchaser at a greater price.

2. Evidence, § 476 * —when weight of evidence does not depend on number of witnesses. The testimony of two or more witnesses does not necessarily have greater weight than the testimony of a single opposing witness.