{
  "id": 5366614,
  "name": "In the matter of the Petition of George Checkesfield. On Appeal of George Checkesfield, Appellant, v. Ethel McKernan, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Checkesfield v. McKernan",
  "decision_date": "1914-05-04",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,333",
  "first_page": "137",
  "last_page": "138",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "186 Ill. App. 137"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1325,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.519,
    "sha256": "9f92766dfb1811964376aac605c675db2821fb552291ec831774bfef1c45423c",
    "simhash": "1:1d4bd2b048d963ce",
    "word_count": 219
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:18:25.002075+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In the matter of the Petition of George Checkesfield. On Appeal of George Checkesfield, Appellant, v. Ethel McKernan, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George Remus and James T. Devere, for appellant.",
      "Pomeroy & Martin, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In the matter of the Petition of George Checkesfield. On Appeal of George Checkesfield, Appellant, v. Ethel McKernan, Appellee.\nGen. No. 19,333.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Frank G. Plain, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed May 4, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nPetition by George Checkesfield in the County Court to be released from imprisonment after being arrested upon a ca. sa. issued on a judgment recovered against him by Ethel MeKernan in a suit for malicious prosecution. From an order denying his petition and remanding him to the custody of the sheriff, petitioner appeals.\nGeorge Remus and James T. Devere, for appellant.\nPomeroy & Martin, for appellee.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nExecution, \u00a7 294 \u2014when denial of petition for release from imprisonment under a ca. sa. proper. On appeal from an order denying a petition for release from imprisonment under a ca. sa. issued on a judgment recovered against the petitioner in a suit for malicious prosecution, held that malice was the gist of such action and that the petition was properly denied.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols, XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0137-01",
  "first_page_order": 183,
  "last_page_order": 184
}