{
  "id": 5371136,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. John L. Witzman et al., Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Witzman",
  "decision_date": "1913-11-13",
  "docket_number": "Gen. Nos. 5,856, 5,857",
  "first_page": "216",
  "last_page": "217",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "186 Ill. App. 216"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 162,
    "char_count": 1681,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.5,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.138363859351185e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4713226524017423
    },
    "sha256": "cf44d83c27b46e63b0870e13153992dd27a14cf80a8f68cdc838d8380c582870",
    "simhash": "1:8e49dba99ba414de",
    "word_count": 289
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:18:25.002075+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. John L. Witzman et al., Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. E. Redmon and W. I. Hibbs, for appellant.",
      "Duncan, Doyle & O\u2019Conor, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. John L. Witzman et al., Appellees.\nGen. Nos. 5,856, 5,857.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of La Salle county; the Hon. S. C. Stotjgh, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1913.\nAppeals dismissed.\nOpinion filed November 13, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nThe two cases above entitled were actions of debt on the official bonds of John L. Witzman as Circuit Clerk of La Salle county covering two terms in said office. In each case all breaches assigned in the declaration were dismissed except the second breach, which related to naturalization fees. In each case the defendants demurred to the second breach and the demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff elected to abide by said demurrer and judgment was entered against him for costs. From the judgment, plaintiff appeals.\nW. E. Redmon and W. I. Hibbs, for appellant.\nDuncan, Doyle & O\u2019Conor, for appellees.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and error, \u00a7 284 \u2014what essential to a final judgment. In order for judgments to he final, the order should adjudge \u201cthat the plaintiff take nothing by his suit, and that the defendants go hence without day.\u201d\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 267 \u2014right of Appellate Oourt to decide on merits when judgment appealed from is not final. On appeal from a judgment which is not final, the Appellate Court cannot ignore the defect and decide the merits for, if it should affirm the action of the trial court, the judgment of the Appellate' Court would be treated as void by the Supreme Court.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0216-01",
  "first_page_order": 262,
  "last_page_order": 263
}