{
  "id": 5366981,
  "name": "Mary E. Quick, Plaintiff in Error, v. Clayton Patterson, Executor, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Quick v. Patterson",
  "decision_date": "1914-04-15",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 5,829",
  "first_page": "223",
  "last_page": "224",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "186 Ill. App. 223"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 149,
    "char_count": 1521,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.497,
    "sha256": "fdab87dcfe6b9994f7bf12059436b3b772c814c8dea035c80305befc1d8b47c3",
    "simhash": "1:c5d5ca95ea4d7024",
    "word_count": 262
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:18:25.002075+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Mary E. Quick, Plaintiff in Error, v. Clayton Patterson, Executor, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Whitney\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Whitney"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "F. E. Brower, H. T. Smith and W. C. DeWolf, for plaintiff in error.",
      "George Brown, G. E. Stott and Jones & Rogers, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Mary E. Quick, Plaintiff in Error, v. Clayton Patterson, Executor, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 5,829.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Circuit Court of DeKalh county; the Hon. Mazzini Slusser, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed April 15, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nPetition by Mary E. Quick in the County Court in the matter of the estate of Henry Patterson, deceased, for the allowance of a child\u2019s award. The County Court denied the prayer of the petition. An appeal was taken to the Circuit Court and heard with the same result. To reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court, the petitioner brings error.\nF. E. Brower, H. T. Smith and W. C. DeWolf, for plaintiff in error.\nGeorge Brown, G. E. Stott and Jones & Rogers, for defendant in error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nExecutors and administrators, \u00a7 175 \u2014when married daughter not entitled, to a child\u2019s award. Under section 77 of the statute relating to \u201cAdministration of Estates,\u201d J. & A. f 126, a married daughter of a deceased householder is not entitled to a child\u2019s award because of the fact she lived with her father while teaching school where her husband resided in another place and she visited him on Sundays and their relations as husband and wife were in no way adverse. In such case her residence is that of her husband.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0223-01",
  "first_page_order": 269,
  "last_page_order": 270
}