{
  "id": 5366755,
  "name": "H. C. Forney, Appellee, v. Crawford Locomotive & Car Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Forney v. Crawford Locomotive & Car Co.",
  "decision_date": "1914-04-15",
  "docket_number": "Glen. No. 5,849",
  "first_page": "232",
  "last_page": "232",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "186 Ill. App. 232"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 93,
    "char_count": 927,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.544,
    "sha256": "0ebb515e64c32bcb70675957cc440e1539c90da372afe7e74a5d5aadaf3522ae",
    "simhash": "1:56c55b1783692010",
    "word_count": 155
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:18:25.002075+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "H. C. Forney, Appellee, v. Crawford Locomotive & Car Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Whitney\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Whitney"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Robert E. Larkin, for appellant.",
      "No appearance for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "H. C. Forney, Appellee, v. Crawford Locomotive & Car Company, Appellant.\nGlen. No. 5,849.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of La Salle county; the Hon. Edgab Eldbidge, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1913.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed April 15, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by H. C. Forney against Crawford Locomotive & Car Company, a corporation, to recover a balance claimed to be dne for wages. The plaintiff was a brother of the plaintiff in the case of Forney v. Crawford Locomotive & Car Co., ante, p. 231, and hired ont at the same time and each testified for the other substantially to the. same facts as in that case. This case is practically and substantially the same as that case and the decision rendered therein held controlling.\nRobert E. Larkin, for appellant.\nNo appearance for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0232-01",
  "first_page_order": 278,
  "last_page_order": 278
}
