{
  "id": 5367430,
  "name": "Frank Jackson, Appellee, v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jackson v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1914-05-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "531",
  "last_page": "532",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "186 Ill. App. 531"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 136,
    "char_count": 1446,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.547,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3927525913029047e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6431380748452902
    },
    "sha256": "c3476d5806b94a7262f02297152707c4a88e63a4d3aa6fdb0d5899c9d9e8ef82",
    "simhash": "1:467170f818c92601",
    "word_count": 245
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:18:25.002075+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Frank Jackson, Appellee, v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Harris\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nAttorney and client, \u00a7 134 \u2014upon whom notice for attorney\u2019s lien must he served. Section 55, ch. 83, Hurd\u2019s R. S. J. & A. \u00b6 611, providing that notice for attorney\u2019s lien shall be -served upon the party against whom the attorney\u2019s client may have suit, means that the notice must be personally served on the party against whom summons would issue, and the personal service of such notice should follow the law as to service of process where the party is a corporation.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Harris"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "C. E. Pope and Arthur Roe, for appellant; Charles A. Schmettau, of counsel.",
      "F. M. Guinn, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Frank Jackson, Appellee, v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad Company, Appellant.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Fayette county; the Hon. Albebt M. Rose, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1913.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed May 1, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nPetition by F. M. Guinn for an attorney\u2019s lien under section 55, ch. 83, R. S., J. & A. \u00b6 611. Petitioner represented Frank Jackson in a suit against Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad Company and served notice of his employment by Jackson on an attorney for the Railroad Company. From a judgment in favor of petitioner for $62.50 attorney\u2019s fees, the Railroad Company appeals.\nC. E. Pope and Arthur Roe, for appellant; Charles A. Schmettau, of counsel.\nF. M. Guinn, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols, XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0531-01",
  "first_page_order": 577,
  "last_page_order": 578
}