#### S. F. Svenson, Defendant in Error, v. H. J. Le Brun, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 19,431.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John D. Turnbaugh, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 25, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by S. F. Svenson against H. J. Le Brun in which, the brief of defendant states, a judgment was entered against him “for an alleged unpaid balance *243on a painting contract.” To reverse a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant brings error.

. Abstract of the Decision.

Appeal and error, § 1414*—when judgment of trial court conclusive. On writ of error to review a judgment entered against plaintiff in error for a balance due for painting, where it was assigned for error that the trial court did not decide the case on the weight of the evidence, and it appeared that the defense to the action was that the work was not properly done, held that in such a case the judgment of the trial court was conclusive where there was no manifest reason to disagree with his conclusion.

Benjamin F. J. Odell, for plaintiff in error.

Monroe Fulkerson, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.