{
  "id": 2854718,
  "name": "Wisconsin Iron and Wire Works, Defendant in Error, v. George W. Stiles Construction Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wisconsin Iron & Wire Works v. George W. Stiles Construction Co.",
  "decision_date": "1914-05-19",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,470",
  "first_page": "4",
  "last_page": "4",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "187 Ill. App. 4"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 137,
    "char_count": 1691,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.479,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.207966869300525e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3274132970686708
    },
    "sha256": "f3282a8a05e0bea174e1ccc6233bce2eb5ee78f0c831dcb7fda8eee8039e6f77",
    "simhash": "1:035b1e03938e889c",
    "word_count": 278
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:57:10.884591+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Wisconsin Iron and Wire Works, Defendant in Error, v. George W. Stiles Construction Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Sheriff, Dent, Dobyns & Freeman, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Henry M. Hagan, for defendant in erorr."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Wisconsin Iron and Wire Works, Defendant in Error, v. George W. Stiles Construction Company, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 19,470.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nSales, \u00a7 329 \u2014when evidence insufficient to sustain a recovery \u25a0for the amount sued for. In an action to recover $71.30 claimed to he a balance due for ornamental iron work furnished to defendant, where plaintiff\u2019s prima facie case was waived, and defendant introduced in evidence letters of plaintiff showing that plaintiff had credited the account with items amounting to $12.50, held that a judgment in favor of plaintiff for the amount sued for could not he sustained, and the judgment was affirmed on condition of remittitur of $12.50.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph S. LaBuy, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1913.\nAffirmed on remittitur.\nOpinion filed May 19, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction brought in the Municipal Court of Chicago by Wisconsin Iron and Wire Works, a corporation, against George W. Stiles Construction Company, a corporation, to recover $71.30, claimed to be a balance due on a contract for the furnishing by the plaintiff to the defendant of certain ornamental iron work for a post office. Proof of plaintiff\u2019s prima facie case was waived on the trial. To reverse a judgment in favor of plaintiff for the amount sued for, defendant brings error.\nSheriff, Dent, Dobyns & Freeman, for plaintiff in error.\nHenry M. Hagan, for defendant in erorr.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0004-01",
  "first_page_order": 30,
  "last_page_order": 30
}