{
  "id": 2854965,
  "name": "George Shields, Defendant in Error, v. Bergendahl-Bass Engineering & Construction Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Shields v. Bergendahl-Bass Engineering & Construction Co.",
  "decision_date": "1914-05-19",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,491",
  "first_page": "5",
  "last_page": "6",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "187 Ill. App. 5"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 227,
    "char_count": 3028,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.535,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.348625924822957e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3362213395452785
    },
    "sha256": "a04c1ee6bdbc25130b0640f4bcb845fd387221c17213524465026c37d3a204a6",
    "simhash": "1:f2ebf637160e903c",
    "word_count": 525
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:57:10.884591+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George Shields, Defendant in Error, v. Bergendahl-Bass Engineering & Construction Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n4. Master and servant, \u00a7 383 \u2014when servant assumes the risk. An. experienced structural iron worker held to have assumed the risk of an injury, where there was no evidence that the conditions under which he was laboring were unusual, it appearing that all the conditions and dangers were as apparent to him as to the employer and there being no claim that any of the conditions or dangers were unknown to him.\n5. Master and servant, \u00a7 188*\u2014when order of foreman not misleading as to the dangers of the work. An order by a foreman to go to a place and assist in placing a beam, held not to mislead the servant as to the dangers of doing the work.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ralph F. Potter, for plaintiff in error.",
      "L. W. Carpenter, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "George Shields, Defendant in Error, v. Bergendahl-Bass Engineering & Construction Company, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 19,491.\n(Not to be reported in* full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Master and servant, \u00a7 244 \u2014when master not liable to servant for negligence of foreman. The master is not liable to the servant for an injury received through the negligence of a foreman while acting as a colaborer with the servant, where the injury is the result of the way in which the common work is done and not of any exercise of the foreman\u2019s authority.\n2. Master and servant, \u00a7 248*\u2014when foreman is a fellow-servant. Where a foreman called to two structural iron workers, \u201ccome over here, fellows, and we will put this beam in,\u201d and then told them, \u201cyou get that end and I\u2019ll get this end,\u201d and the foreman while assisting with his end pulled the beam so that the two iron workers' fell and one of them was -injured, held that the foreman was a fellow-servant of the one injured with reference to the act which contributed to the injury.\n3. Master and servant, \u00a7 137*\u2014when rule imposing duty to furnish safe place to worh does not apply. The ordinary rules imposing upon the master the nondelegable duty of furnishing his employes with a reasonably safe place to work do not apply where the work being done by the employe and his fellow-workmen at the time of his injury was in the erection of a building, under conditions which were temporary and constantly changing by reason of the necessities of the work itself.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Frederick L. Fake, Jr., Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1913.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed May 19, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by George Shields against Bergendahl-Bass Engineering & Construction Company to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while employed as a structural iron worker. From a judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of plaintiff for five hundred dollars, defendant prosecutes a writ of error.\nRalph F. Potter, for plaintiff in error.\nL. W. Carpenter, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols SI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols XI to XV, onel Cumulative Quarterly, samo topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0005-01",
  "first_page_order": 31,
  "last_page_order": 32
}