{
  "id": 2859405,
  "name": "Nellie M. Staat, Defendant in Error, v. William H. Coughenour, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Staat v. Coughenour",
  "decision_date": "1914-05-20",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,619",
  "first_page": "36",
  "last_page": "37",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "187 Ill. App. 36"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 153,
    "char_count": 1853,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.527,
    "sha256": "c644ed92a69759cb52c7c0a4f515fb982db20d8b443e309c86e3d327622c8787",
    "simhash": "1:cc964a2d702dd87c",
    "word_count": 324
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:57:10.884591+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Nellie M. Staat, Defendant in Error, v. William H. Coughenour, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Graves\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Judgment, \u00a7 127*\u2014when essential to set aside a default judgment. It is only where a meritorious defense exists and the default is not due to the negligence of the party defaulted that a judgment following such default will be set aside to let the party in to make a defense on the merits that by the exercise of diligence would have been presented before the default.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Graves"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Lewis Edward Dickinson, for plaintiff in error.",
      "A. W. Fulton, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Nellie M. Staat, Defendant in Error, v. William H. Coughenour, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 18,619.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Judgment, \u00a7 132 \u2014when denial of motion to set aside default not an abuse of discretion. On motion to set aside a default judgment entered for failure of defendant to file his appearance in pursuance of a rule on him to do so two weeks before the entry of the judgment, the action of the court in overruling the motion held not an abuse of discretion, it appearing that the motion was not made until twenty-eight days after the judgment was entered and no reason shown by the affidavit in support of the motion why defendant did not hire an attorney and have his appearance entered before the default and before the judgment was entered and where no meritorious defense is shown.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hugh R. Stewart, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed May 20, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nMotion by William H. Coughenour to set aside a default judgment entered against him in favor of Nellie M. Staat. To reverse an order overruling the motion, Coughenour prosecutes a writ of error.\nLewis Edward Dickinson, for plaintiff in error.\nA. W. Fulton, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0036-01",
  "first_page_order": 62,
  "last_page_order": 63
}