{
  "id": 2856953,
  "name": "Nellie Loeb, Defendant in Error, v. Blanche Yovin, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Loeb v. Yovin",
  "decision_date": "1914-05-25",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,075",
  "first_page": "219",
  "last_page": "219",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "187 Ill. App. 219"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 80,
    "char_count": 802,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.545,
    "sha256": "5bdf1bbb4b9831a095cbd42fe44172d8eaba92aa1df0fdb80d8d50ffbc20f66b",
    "simhash": "1:df766e36859fb26e",
    "word_count": 141
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:57:10.884591+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Nellie Loeb, Defendant in Error, v. Blanche Yovin, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Brown\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Brown"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles Daniels, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Goldzier, Rodgers & Froehlich, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Nellie Loeb, Defendant in Error, v. Blanche Yovin, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 19,075.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles N. Goodnow, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1913.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed May 25, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nThis is a writ of error in the replevin suit referred to in Loeb v. Yovin, p. 217, ante. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and the court found for plaintiff on the same evidence that was presented in that case, and for the reasons stated in that case held that the finding was against the weight of the evidence.\nCharles Daniels, for plaintiff in error.\nGoldzier, Rodgers & Froehlich, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0219-01",
  "first_page_order": 245,
  "last_page_order": 245
}