{
  "id": 2856359,
  "name": "Conrad Reichards, Appellee, v. Illinois Furniture Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Reichards v. Illinois Furniture Co.",
  "decision_date": "1914-06-29",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,944",
  "first_page": "434",
  "last_page": "435",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "187 Ill. App. 434"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 165,
    "char_count": 2010,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.531,
    "sha256": "3034c22eaa2ddaa377327c91bd19b379abe74aceed2ed1838f73e0d3a4a10b0a",
    "simhash": "1:98d7e2f55d9a8277",
    "word_count": 317
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:57:10.884591+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Conrad Reichards, Appellee, v. Illinois Furniture Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nMalicious pbosecution, \u00a7 75 \u2014when evidence sufficient to show probable cause. In an action for malicious prosecution, where the facts showed plaintiff had been arrested on a complaint filed by defendant charging him with removing mortgaged property without the consent of the mortgagee in violation of section 7, ch. 95, R. S., J. & A 1f 7582, and had been discharged, held that a judgment for plaintiff could not be sustained for the reason that the evidence showed that defendant had probable cause for instituting the prosecution.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Shaeffer, Kompel & Rosenberg, for appellant.",
      "P. L. O\u2019Meara, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Conrad Reichards, Appellee, v. Illinois Furniture Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 19,944.\n(Not to he reported in. full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Samuel C. Stough, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed June 29, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Conrad Reichards against Illinois Furniture Company, a corporation, for malicious prosecution. Plaintiff had bought furniture from defendant on the instalment plan and for deferred payments had given his note secured by a chattel mortgage on the furniture purchased. Without notice to or consent of defendant, plaintiff twice removed the mortgaged property to different addresses in Chicago and later went to Cincinnati \"in quest of employment and his wife removed the property to another address in the city of Chicago. Upon plaintiff\u2019s return he was arrested on a complaint filed by defendant charging him with removing mortgaged property without the consent of the mortgagee in violation of section 7, ch. 95, R. S., J. & A. 7582. Plaintiff was discharged and later brought this action. From a judgment for plaintiff for one hundred and fifty dollars damages, defendant appeals.\nShaeffer, Kompel & Rosenberg, for appellant.\nP. L. O\u2019Meara, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0434-01",
  "first_page_order": 460,
  "last_page_order": 461
}