{
  "id": 2854745,
  "name": "Frank Vogel, Jr., Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Rock Island, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Vogel v. City of Rock Island",
  "decision_date": "1914-05-21",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 5,929",
  "first_page": "537",
  "last_page": "538",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "187 Ill. App. 537"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 116,
    "char_count": 1223,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.504,
    "sha256": "fbd7ca9ac13249d44ffb66d6a097a778e7fe7af857ea0b438529a32b42a1ecf7",
    "simhash": "1:8071afa3ea08d39c",
    "word_count": 206
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:57:10.884591+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Frank Vogel, Jr., Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Rock Island, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. M. Chamberlain and Sturtz & Ewan, for plaintiff in error.",
      "J. F. Witter, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Frank Vogel, Jr., Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Rock Island, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 5,929.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nError to the Circuit Court of Rock Island county; the Hon. Robert W. Olmsted, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1914.\nDismissed.\nOpinion filed May 21, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Frank Vogel, Jr., against City of Eock Island in which the court below sustained a demurrer to plaintiff\u2019s amended declaration. Plaintiff elected to abide by his amended declaration, and judgment was entered against him for costs. To reverse the judgment, plaintiff prosecutes a writ of error..\nAbstract of the Decision.\nAppeal and eeroe, \u00a7 278 \u2014when judgment entered on sustaining a demurrer not final. A judgment rendered against a plaintiff for costs on sustaining a demurrer to his declaration is not a final judgment which is reviewable on writ of error, where it does not adjudge that plaintiff take nothing by his suit and that defendant go hence without day, etc.\nW. M. Chamberlain and Sturtz & Ewan, for plaintiff in error.\nJ. F. Witter, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0537-01",
  "first_page_order": 563,
  "last_page_order": 564
}