{
  "id": 5389786,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Louis Thexton, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Thexton",
  "decision_date": "1914-07-31",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 5,963",
  "first_page": "2",
  "last_page": "3",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "188 Ill. App. 2"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 149,
    "char_count": 1710,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.527,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.224091964542211e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5988881977289023
    },
    "sha256": "3f53ed05ad5df14d282a3f740b4add5459f5e3eb96683ed13cad4638acfe7116",
    "simhash": "1:aa7e8b80f801d3f8",
    "word_count": 293
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:17:45.032867+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Louis Thexton, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Whitney\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Whitney"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. C. Murphy and E. L. Lyon, for appellant.",
      "Charles W. Hadley, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Louis Thexton, Appellant.\nden. No. 5,963.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Du Page county; the Hon. Mazzini Slussee, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed July 31, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by the People of the State of Illinois against Louis Thexton to recover, a- penalty for the violation. of tiie automobile law, the offense charged being the running of an automobile at a rate of speed prohibited by statute. Judgment was entered against defendant for five dollars penalty. To reverse the judgment, defendant appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Automobiles and garaqes, \u00a7 1 \u2014when finding of guilty of unlawful speed sustained by evidence. In an action to recover a penalty for running an automobile at a rate of speed prohibited by statute, a finding of guilty held sustained by sufficient evidence.\n2. Automobiles and garages, \u00a7 1*\u2014necessity of intent to constitute violation of automobile law. The only intention necessary to render a person liable to a penalty for a violation of the automobile law is the doing of the act prohibited.\n3. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1715*\u2014when objection to remedy for review waived. The right of appellee to raise the question that the case could only he presented for review by a writ of error is waived by joining in a stipulation as to the hill of exceptions and filing briefs in the Appellate Court.\nJ. C. Murphy and E. L. Lyon, for appellant.\nCharles W. Hadley, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number,"
  },
  "file_name": "0002-01",
  "first_page_order": 22,
  "last_page_order": 23
}