{
  "id": 5388565,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Gust Anderson, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Anderson",
  "decision_date": "1914-10-06",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,156",
  "first_page": "550",
  "last_page": "551",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "188 Ill. App. 550"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 160,
    "char_count": 1914,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.537,
    "sha256": "734873448db124d6b5bb8ecd12bbb6df9b536fcc8c91ed71cdf9e829ddf324a6",
    "simhash": "1:c032cc9c792dfe9c",
    "word_count": 327
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:17:45.032867+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Gust Anderson, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hector A. Brouillet, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Maclay Hoyne and Edward E. Wilson, for defendant in error; Joseph R. Fahy, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Gust Anderson, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 20,156.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edwabb T. Wade, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 6, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nComplainant in the Municipal Court of Chicago by the People of the State of Illinois against Gust Anderson, charging defendant with assault and battery on Jonas Olson. To reverse a judgment finding defendant guilty, imposing a fine of $100 and costs, and committing him to the House of Correction until the fine and costs are paid or worked out at the rate of $1.50 per day, defendant prosecutes a writ of error.\nHector A. Brouillet, for plaintiff in error.\nMaclay Hoyne and Edward E. Wilson, for defendant in error; Joseph R. Fahy, of counsel.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Assault and battery, \u00a7 31 \u2014where proof of name of injured, party sufficient. A conviction for assault and battery held sustained by proof in the record of the name of the injured party, where it appeared that Anna Olson made the complaint charging the defendant with assault on Jonas Olson, and the evidence in the record shows that Jonas Olson was the husband of the complaining witness and the party who was struck and injured.\n2. Assault and battery, \u00a7 36*\u2014when judgment of conviction not improper. A judgment finding defendant guilty of assault and battery held not subject to the objection that it required defendant to pay money to the injured party, where the record did not so show, it appearing that the court attempted to induce defendant to pay the injured party\u2019s doctor bill, etc., but the proposition was later rejected.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0550-01",
  "first_page_order": 570,
  "last_page_order": 571
}