{
  "id": 5388507,
  "name": "Sam Frankenstein, Defendant in Error, v. Max Weber and David Weber, Copartners, trading as Weber Brothers, Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Frankenstein v. Weber",
  "decision_date": "1914-10-07",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,198",
  "first_page": "573",
  "last_page": "574",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "188 Ill. App. 573"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 138,
    "char_count": 1542,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.507,
    "sha256": "c3479b337454a576f8ee26fa665966f5aee6c2583069391e27c25d1b36e9b9c9",
    "simhash": "1:dc774396912fe128",
    "word_count": 256
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:17:45.032867+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Sam Frankenstein, Defendant in Error, v. Max Weber and David Weber, Copartners, trading as Weber Brothers, Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baume\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Municipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 26 \u2014sufficiency of statement of facts. The record does not contain a correct statement of facts, where what purports to he such a statement is merely a statement that certain witnesses testified to certain facts, in substance, as there stated in narrative form.\n2. Sales, \u00a7 329*\u2014sufficiency of evidence. On review of a judgment for the purchase price of goods sold and delivered, evidence in the record as presented held to show an original promise by defendants to pay for the articles furnished.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baume"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "A. L. Weber, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Isaac Anderson Loeb, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Sam Frankenstein, Defendant in Error, v. Max Weber and David Weber, Copartners, trading as Weber Brothers, Plaintiffs in Error.\nGen. No. 19,198.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hugh J. Kearns, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 7, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Sam Frankenstein against Max Weber and David Weber, copartners, trading as Weber Brothers, to recover a balance alleged to be due for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered. Upon a trial by the court there was a finding and judgment against defendants for the amount claimed to be due. To reverse the judgment, defendants bring error.\nA. L. Weber, for plaintiffs in error.\nIsaac Anderson Loeb, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Yols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number*"
  },
  "file_name": "0573-01",
  "first_page_order": 593,
  "last_page_order": 594
}