{
  "id": 2904388,
  "name": "Jonathan Ade, Appellee, v. Bertha Ade et al., Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ade v. Ade",
  "decision_date": "1914-11-19",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,860",
  "first_page": "501",
  "last_page": "501",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "189 Ill. App. 501"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 165,
    "char_count": 1904,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.567,
    "sha256": "0950578bbaab70a224298b2f0f934ef791a7a255d0cd9cce6f2a606276ea9905",
    "simhash": "1:42525161b06e44ec",
    "word_count": 309
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:38:10.053698+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Jonathan Ade, Appellee, v. Bertha Ade et al., Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Pam\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Pam"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Albert H. Fry, for appellants.",
      "Bither, Goff & Francis, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Jonathan Ade, Appellee, v. Bertha Ade et al., Appellants.\nGen. No. 19,860.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nCreditor\u2019s suit, \u00a7 56 \u2014when evidence sufficient to show valid consideration for conveyance. On creditor\u2019s bill to reach property conveyed by defendant to her children, where- the defendant claimed that the conveyance was made pursuant to an express agreement to reimburse the children for money advanced and support furnished, and the complainant claimed that the moneys advanced were in the form of a gratuity and in the performance of a natural duty owing from children to their parents, held that a finding in favor of complainant was against the weight of the evidence, it appearing that the evidence to establish the contract was uncontradicted and that the children had advanced sums pursuant to the agreement, for taxes, insurance premiums and ordinary household expenses, which amounted to more than twice the value of the property conveyed.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. William E. Dever, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1913.\nReversed and remanded with directions.\nOpinion filed November 19, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nCreditor\u2019s bill filed by Jonathan Ade against Bertha Ade, William H. Ade, Hazel Ade and Theodore J. Ade, based on a judgment of the Municipal Court of Chicago in favor of complainant and against Bertha Ade. Answers were filed by all the defendants and, on issue joined, the case was referred to a master. The master found in favor of complainant and against the defendants. To reverse a decree confirming the findings of the master, defendants appeal.\nAlbert H. Fry, for appellants.\nBither, Goff & Francis, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0501-01",
  "first_page_order": 527,
  "last_page_order": 527
}
