#### James Karkaboses, Defendant in Error, v. Kalodimos Brothers Ice Cream & Candy Company, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 20,041.

(Not to he reported in full.)

Abstract of the Decision.

Master and servant, § 84 * —sufficiency of evidence. Where it was contended that plaintiff’s wages were to be applied on the purchase of a candy store or business by plaintiff, who was a minor working for defendant at the time, and defendant took the place back and rescinded the sale without returning a certain amount paid on account of the purchase price, a findihg in favor of plaintiff on conflicting evidence sustained.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hush R. Stewart, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1914.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 30, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by James Karkaboses against Kalodimos Brothers Ice Cream & Candy Company for wages alleged to be due for working for defendant at $20 per month from November 17, 1912, to April 14, 1913. A judgment was entered for $98 in favor of the plaintiff and defendant sued out a writ of error.

Percival Steele, for plaintiff in error.

Pantelis & Resa, for defendant in error.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice Brown

delivered the opinion of the court.