{
  "id": 2903924,
  "name": "Michelin Tire Company, Defendant in Error, v. Antonio Sbarbaro et al., trading as Simplex Automobile Company, on appeal of Antonio Sbarbaro, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Michelin Tire Co. v. Sbarbaro",
  "decision_date": "1914-11-25",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,032",
  "first_page": "585",
  "last_page": "586",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "189 Ill. App. 585"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 144,
    "char_count": 1661,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.516,
    "sha256": "b616ab152ab73e491005c3176157d4f7ed66b675335ebba0b8c0e4d6c2762623",
    "simhash": "1:dc768f659d1e3198",
    "word_count": 275
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:38:10.053698+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Michelin Tire Company, Defendant in Error, v. Antonio Sbarbaro et al., trading as Simplex Automobile Company, on appeal of Antonio Sbarbaro, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Duncan\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Duncan"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Richard I. Gavin, for plaintiff in error Antonio Sbarbaro.",
      "Baker & Holder, for defendant in error; G. Raymond Collins, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Michelin Tire Company, Defendant in Error, v. Antonio Sbarbaro et al., trading as Simplex Automobile Company, on appeal of Antonio Sbarbaro, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 19,032.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nSales, \u00a7 329 \u2014when findings of court will not he disturbed. In a suit for goods sold and delivered to a partnership, where the case was tried by the court, a jury having been waived, and the evidence as to the existence of the partnership was directly conflicting, the credibility of the witnesses was for the court and his finding was entitled to the same force as a verdict of a jury, wherefore it would not be disturbed unless manifestly against the weight of the evidence.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. George J. Cowing, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed November 25, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nSuit by Michelin Tire Company against Antonio Sbarbaro and Leonard A. Shadburne, copartners, trading as the Simplex Automobile Company, for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered. Only Sbarbaro was served with process, who denied in his affidavit of defense the fact of partnership and also denied the purchase of the goods. The court gave judgment for the amount sued for, $318.60, a jury having been waived, and the defendant brings error.\nRichard I. Gavin, for plaintiff in error Antonio Sbarbaro.\nBaker & Holder, for defendant in error; G. Raymond Collins, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0585-01",
  "first_page_order": 611,
  "last_page_order": 612
}
