{
  "id": 2908929,
  "name": "Joseph C. Wickliffe, Appellee, v. City of Chicago, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wickliffe v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1914-11-30",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,914",
  "first_page": "618",
  "last_page": "618",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "189 Ill. App. 618"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 143,
    "char_count": 1703,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.538,
    "sha256": "d953eb488b532e78aa80d34709d40ac0d5610f6731d6640c3e7c7c4160b0270d",
    "simhash": "1:12e2ff86198984b8",
    "word_count": 287
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:38:10.053698+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Joseph C. Wickliffe, Appellee, v. City of Chicago, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Brown\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis appeal differs from the cause No. 19,912 in this court, ante, p. 610, wherein an opinion has been filed, in no essential respect. It was decided upon the pleadings, and the pleadings differ in no material particular from those in said cause No. 19,912. The petitioner was removed from his position at the same time as Captain Ellfeldt and as a result of the same investigation, as will appear by reference to the opinion in No. 19,912. Our decision is governed by the same considerations.\nThe judgment of the Superior Court of Cook county is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court with directions to overrule the demurrer.\nReversed and remanded with directions.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Brown"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William H. Sexton, for appellant; Joseph F. Grossman and John E. Foster, of counsel.",
      "West & Eckhart, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Joseph C. Wickliffe, Appellee, v. City of Chicago, Appellant.\nGen. No. 19,914.\nAppeal and error, \u00a7 1813 \u2014when opinion in former decision adopted. Where the pleadings differ in no material particular from those in another case decided on the pleadings in a mandamus proceeding arising out of the removal of an officer in the civil service of the City of Chicago, at the same time and upon the same investigation in which an opinion was, rendered by the Appellate Court,' such court adopted the opinion as its opinion in the case at bar.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Charles M. Foell, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.\nReversed and remanded with directions.\nOpinion filed November 30, 1914.\nWilliam H. Sexton, for appellant; Joseph F. Grossman and John E. Foster, of counsel.\nWest & Eckhart, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, game topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0618-01",
  "first_page_order": 644,
  "last_page_order": 644
}