{
  "id": 2910586,
  "name": "James Karkaboses, Defendant in Error, v. Kalodimos Brothers Ice Cream & Candy Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Karkaboses v. Kalodimos Bros. Ice Cream & Candy Co.",
  "decision_date": "1914-11-30",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,041",
  "first_page": "619",
  "last_page": "619",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "189 Ill. App. 619"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1337,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.556,
    "sha256": "bdaa7a941a712490344ae7815e0c261df4de90bb5973d83169eb1672f8a09dd6",
    "simhash": "1:4ec348c4e987b43c",
    "word_count": 223
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:38:10.053698+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James Karkaboses, Defendant in Error, v. Kalodimos Brothers Ice Cream & Candy Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Brown\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Brown"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Percival Steele, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Pantelis & Resa, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James Karkaboses, Defendant in Error, v. Kalodimos Brothers Ice Cream & Candy Company, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 20,041.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nMaster and servant, \u00a7 84 \u2014sufficiency of evidence. Where it was contended that plaintiff\u2019s wages were to be applied on the purchase of a candy store or business by plaintiff, who was a minor working for defendant at the time, and defendant took the place back and rescinded the sale without returning a certain amount paid on account of the purchase price, a findihg in favor of plaintiff on conflicting evidence sustained.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hush R. Stewart, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed November 30, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by James Karkaboses against Kalodimos Brothers Ice Cream & Candy Company for wages alleged to be due for working for defendant at $20 per month from November 17, 1912, to April 14, 1913. A judgment was entered for $98 in favor of the plaintiff and defendant sued out a writ of error.\nPercival Steele, for plaintiff in error.\nPantelis & Resa, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0619-01",
  "first_page_order": 645,
  "last_page_order": 645
}