{
  "id": 4900079,
  "name": "Haines & Whitney Co. v. Jacob S. McFerren",
  "name_abbreviation": "Haines & Whitney Co. v. McFerren",
  "decision_date": "1886-01-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "172",
  "last_page": "174",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "19 Ill. App. 172"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "41 Ill. 267",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5218374
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/41/0267-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "23 Pick. 332",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Pick.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "41 Ill. 267",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5218374
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/41/0267-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 246,
    "char_count": 3674,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.499,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15428814575676034
    },
    "sha256": "a729acbf7139b062a4905c086728f8d281f9f0d583a8d1701693a87e11e3fb43",
    "simhash": "1:d15380b1c8249c4c",
    "word_count": 643
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:51:07.529816+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Haines & Whitney Co. v. Jacob S. McFerren."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Congee, J.\nThis was an action of assumpsit. The declaration alleges that on the 29th day of April, 1884, plaintiffs in error drew a draft upon Wm. H. Bandy, as follows :\n\u201c 8210. Chicago, April 29, 1S84.\n\u201cAt sight pay to the order of Haines & Whitney Company, two hundred and ten dollars, at Second National Bank, with ' exchange.\n\u201cValue received and charge to account of Haines & Whitney Co.\n\u201c S. H. Hiliken, Treas.\n\u201cTo Wm. H. Bandy, Danville, Ill.\u201d\nHpon which draft were the following acceptance and indorsements.\n\u201c Accepted April 29th, \u201984. Payable at Second National Bank. W. H. Bandy.\n\u201cFor deposit in the First National Bank, Chicago, to the Credit of Haines & Whitney Co.\n\u201c Per S. H. Hiliken, Treas.\n\u201cPay to the order of State Bank, Danville, Ill., for collection account of First Nat. Bank, Chicago, April 29th, 1884.\n\u201c H. E. Sxmonds, Cashier.\u201d\nThat on the same day the last named bank transmitted the draft for collection to the State Bank of Danville (the defendant in error); that said Bandy had money on deposit to his credit in said Second National Bank of Danville, where the draft was made payable, \u201csufficient to pay the said draft with exchange thereon, which mi-ney was, during said time, subject to the payment of said draft upon the presentation of the same to the said Second National Bank.\u201d\nThe declaration avers that it was the duty of defendant to have presented said draft \u201c to or at \u201d the Second National Bank and demanded of said bank payment, which they neglected to do, and that Bandy afterward withdrew his deposit from said Second National Bank, became insolvent and died, and that his estate was insolvent, by reason whdreof said draft was never paid and plaintiff lost the same. To this declaration a general demurrer was interposed and sustained by the court, and plaintiff electing to stand by the declaration, judgment for costs was entered against plaintiff in error.\nWe think the demurrer was well sustained. The draft was not drawn on the Second National Bank but on Bandy. Had it been presented to the bank it could not have paid the draft without some further authority from Bandy. \" A bank when a draft is made payable would have no right to pay it or ap ply the money deposited there by the acceptor of such draf, except by the special direction of such acceptor either ve- - bally or by check or draft or some other writing. Wood & Co. v. Merchants\u2019 Saving Co., 41 Ill. 267.\nThe declaration is fatally defective in alleging it to have been the duty of defendants in error to demand payment of the Second Hational Bank; such bank could have had nothing to do with the payment of the draft as above stated except by the direction of Bandy. Had the declaration alleged that Bandy had given such direction in any way known to the law, a different question would be presented. Finding no error in the record the judgment of the circuit court will be affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Congee, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Davis & Mann, for plaintiff in error;",
      "Hr. C. H. Swallow, for defendants in error;"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Haines & Whitney Co. v. Jacob S. McFerren.\nBanking. \u2014 A bank where a draft is made payable has no right to pay it, or apply the money deposited there by the acceptor of such draft, except by the special direction of such acceptor, either verbally, or by check or draft, or some other writing.\nError to the Circuit Court of Vermilion county; the Hon. C. B. Smith, Judge, presiding.\nOpinion filed January 6, 1886.\nMessrs. Davis & Mann, for plaintiff in error;\nas to liability for breach of duty on part of hank in making a collection, cited Morse on Banks and Banking, 341; Tyson v. State Bk. of Ind., 6 Blackford, 225; Fabens v. Mercantile Bk., 23 Pick. 332.\nHr. C. H. Swallow, for defendants in error;\ncited Wood v. Merchants\u2019 Saving Loan and Trust Co., 41 Ill. 267."
  },
  "file_name": "0172-01",
  "first_page_order": 170,
  "last_page_order": 172
}