{
  "id": 4901869,
  "name": "Saunderson v. Town of La Salle",
  "name_abbreviation": "Saunderson v. Town of La Salle",
  "decision_date": "1885-12-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 1421",
  "first_page": "632",
  "last_page": "632",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "19 Ill. App. 632"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "91 Ill. 318",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2753692
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/91/0318-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "71 Ill. 278",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5309318
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/71/0278-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "4 Gil. 131",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Gilmer",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "98 Ill. 343",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2835789
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/98/0343-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 96,
    "char_count": 785,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.465,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15429915025933943
    },
    "sha256": "73832d57eb0771efbad76b481c88721e7fa08d24bcd2f7ea221e90e5e8f6c0cd",
    "simhash": "1:1b66bd8e3c54923a",
    "word_count": 133
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:51:07.529816+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Saunderson v. Town of La Salle."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion\nPee Curiam.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "SECOND DISTRICT.\nNo. 1421.\nSaunderson v. Town of La Salle.\nOpinion filed Dec. 4, 1885.\nSection 89 of Chap. 110, Rev. Statutes, provides that all appeals from inferior courts in cases relating to revenue shall be taken direct to the Supreme Court. This suit relates to revenue, and the appeal should have been taken1 to the Supreme Court: Wing v. People, 7 Bradwell, 224; 9 Bradwell, 520 and 550; 5 Bradwell, 558; 98 Ill. 343. It \u201cis insisted by the appellant that the appellee has, by stipulation, consented to this court taking jurisdiction of this case. This court can not acquire jurisdiction by such consent: 4 Gil. 131; 71 Ill. 278 ; 91 Ill. 318. Motion to dismiss appeal allowed.\nAppeal dismissed. Leave to appellant to withdraw record, abstracts and briefs."
  },
  "file_name": "0632-02",
  "first_page_order": 630,
  "last_page_order": 630
}